SCHRÖDINGER'S EXPERIMENT
WHERE IS DONALD J. TRUMP?
© Paolo Bolzoni, May 2026
From a tale of quantum mechanics.
In
quantum mechanics, Erwin Schrödinger's cat is a thought experiment that
illustrates a paradox of quantum superposition. In the thought
experiment, a hypothetical cat may be considered simultaneously both
alive and dead as a result of its fate being linked to a random
subatomic event that may or may not occur.
Let’s make a thought experiment, err, a VERY REALISTIC EXPERIMENT!
The
scenario is often featured in debates among world leaders on the
interpretations of quantum mechanics, particularly in situations
involving a convicted felon who attempts to destroy the world’s order.
In layman’s terms, Trump remains President until the world remains blind, or he is removed from office before.
Trump
is sitting on his massive gold toilette, locked up in his grand
ballroom, along with a device secured against direct interference by the
outside world.
Outside the ballroom, King Charles III is ready to storm in and teach the felon a lesson.
But also, with equal probability, perhaps the King decides to mind his own business.
If the King stormed in, his rage would releases a hammer that shatters a small flask with the freedom bell in it.
If
one left this entire system to itself till 7 November 2028, one would
say that felon Trump is still the President, provided the King didn’t
storm in.
If the King stormed in, the freedom bell would have rang.
The
psi-function Ψ, of the world’ fate would state this by ignoring the
felon, AND remove him from office, mixed or smeared out in equal
catastrophic consequences for the entire world.
It is typical of
these cases that an indeterminacy, originally restricted to private
business sitting on a massive gold toilette, is transformed into
macroscopic endless mess for the entire world, which can then be only
resolved by locking the felon in a psychiatric swamp in Cuba.
That
prevents us from so naïvely accepting as valid a "blurred model" for
representing reality. In itself, it would not embody anything unclear or
contradictory.
There is a little difference between a shaky, corrupt felon, and a snapshot Armageddon.
After an interval equal to the next war declared by Trump, the felon may or may not be there with the same probability.
It is in a superposition of the two states: in Dirac’s notation, Trump’s state is:
| A ⟩ = 1/√ 2 ( | Trump still there ⟩ + | Trump removed⟩ ).
But
since the King outside the ballroom determines the felon’s fate, it
should be considered both sitting on his massive gold toilette and
removed:
| G ⟩ = 1/√ 2 ( | Trump sacked ⟩ + | Trump still there ⟩ ).
at least until the King observe him by storming into the ballroom.
P.S.
The
apparent paradox arises from the fact that in quantum mechanics it is
not possible to describe objects classically, and a probabilistic
representation is used: to show the fact that a particle can be placed
in different positions, for example, it is described as if it were
simultaneously in all the positions it can take.
Returning to Trump’s case, however, the above description is incorrect.
Schrödinger refers to the "wave function of the whole system", not to Trump’s.
In fact, quantum theory states that the Trump + world’s order is described by the quantum correlation state.
| A, G⟩ = 1 / √ 2 (| King stormed in, Trump removed⟩ + | King did not storm in, Trump is still President⟩).
Therefore,
it is not correct to say that Trump is in a superposition of two
states, because the superposition affects the whole system.
The
fundamental difference is that the two subsystems, namely Trump is still
President and the King stormed in taken individually, are rather
described by a statistical mixture.
The uncertainty about Trump’s
fate is "classic": he is still President or removed with a probability
of 50%, without any interference between the two different states.
Oh Lady Liberty look down here
People decide what they want
We all have equal rights
Not only the MAGA white patriots
Oh my Lady, oh my Lady
Forgive me if I insist
Oh my Lady come down here
We can’t stand it any-more
Van: Astsen voor Gaza 𝐀𝐚𝐧: 𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫 Caspar Veldkamp , Terwijl u uw handtekening zet onder een brief waarin u oproept tot een staakt-het-vuren, ontvangen wij dagelijks beelden van onze collega’s in ziekenhuizen in Gaza. 📍 Beelden van uiteengereten kinderen. 📍 Van uitgemergelde mensen die hun laatste adem uitblazen. 📍 Van artsen die, zonder medicijnen of middelen, de meest onmenselijke keuzes moeten maken 📍 Van artsen die worden ontvoerd, ambulances die worden vernietigd, en medici die worden vermoord. En u, minister, u spreekt intussen van “𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑛𝑖𝑒𝑢𝑤 𝑑𝑖𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑒𝑝𝑢𝑛𝑡 𝑖𝑛 ℎ𝑒𝑡 𝑙𝑖𝑗𝑑𝑒𝑛 𝑣𝑎𝑛 𝑑𝑒 𝑏𝑒𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑣𝑎𝑛 𝐺𝑎𝑧𝑎”. 𝐌𝐚𝐚𝐫 𝐡𝐨𝐞 𝐠𝐞𝐥𝐨𝐨𝐟𝐰𝐚𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐠 𝐢𝐬 𝐮𝐰 𝐦𝐞𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧 𝐰𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐫: -U vorige week nog 𝐄𝐔-𝐬𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐞𝐠𝐞𝐧 𝐈𝐬𝐫𝐚ë𝐥 𝐛𝐥𝐨𝐤𝐤𝐞𝐞𝐫𝐝𝐞; -U beweerde dat het “𝑛𝑜𝑔 𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑒𝑛 𝑤𝑎𝑠” in Gaza; -U schermde met cijfers over voedseltrucks die ...
Comments
Post a Comment