SCHRÖDINGER'S EXPERIMENT
WHERE IS DONALD J. TRUMP?
© Paolo Bolzoni, May 2026
From a tale of quantum mechanics.
In
quantum mechanics, Erwin Schrödinger's cat is a thought experiment that
illustrates a paradox of quantum superposition. In the thought
experiment, a hypothetical cat may be considered simultaneously both
alive and dead as a result of its fate being linked to a random
subatomic event that may or may not occur.
Let’s make a thought experiment, err, a VERY REALISTIC EXPERIMENT!
The
scenario is often featured in debates among world leaders on the
interpretations of quantum mechanics, particularly in situations
involving a convicted felon who attempts to destroy the world’s order.
In layman’s terms, Trump remains President until the world remains blind, or he is removed from office before.
Trump
is sitting on his massive gold toilette, locked up in his grand
ballroom, along with a device secured against direct interference by the
outside world.
Outside the ballroom, King Charles III is ready to storm in and teach the felon a lesson.
But also, with equal probability, perhaps the King decides to mind his own business.
If the King stormed in, his rage would releases a hammer that shatters a small flask with the freedom bell in it.
If
one left this entire system to itself till 7 November 2028, one would
say that felon Trump is still the President, provided the King didn’t
storm in.
If the King stormed in, the freedom bell would have rang.
The
psi-function Ψ, of the world’ fate would state this by ignoring the
felon, AND remove him from office, mixed or smeared out in equal
catastrophic consequences for the entire world.
It is typical of
these cases that an indeterminacy, originally restricted to private
business sitting on a massive gold toilette, is transformed into
macroscopic endless mess for the entire world, which can then be only
resolved by locking the felon in a psychiatric swamp in Cuba.
That
prevents us from so naïvely accepting as valid a "blurred model" for
representing reality. In itself, it would not embody anything unclear or
contradictory.
There is a little difference between a shaky, corrupt felon, and a snapshot Armageddon.
After an interval equal to the next war declared by Trump, the felon may or may not be there with the same probability.
It is in a superposition of the two states: in Dirac’s notation, Trump’s state is:
| A ⟩ = 1/√ 2 ( | Trump still there ⟩ + | Trump removed⟩ ).
But
since the King outside the ballroom determines the felon’s fate, it
should be considered both sitting on his massive gold toilette and
removed:
| G ⟩ = 1/√ 2 ( | Trump sacked ⟩ + | Trump still there ⟩ ).
at least until the King observe him by storming into the ballroom.
P.S.
The
apparent paradox arises from the fact that in quantum mechanics it is
not possible to describe objects classically, and a probabilistic
representation is used: to show the fact that a particle can be placed
in different positions, for example, it is described as if it were
simultaneously in all the positions it can take.
Returning to Trump’s case, however, the above description is incorrect.
Schrödinger refers to the "wave function of the whole system", not to Trump’s.
In fact, quantum theory states that the Trump + world’s order is described by the quantum correlation state.
| A, G⟩ = 1 / √ 2 (| King stormed in, Trump removed⟩ + | King did not storm in, Trump is still President⟩).
Therefore,
it is not correct to say that Trump is in a superposition of two
states, because the superposition affects the whole system.
The
fundamental difference is that the two subsystems, namely Trump is still
President and the King stormed in taken individually, are rather
described by a statistical mixture.
The uncertainty about Trump’s
fate is "classic": he is still President or removed with a probability
of 50%, without any interference between the two different states.
Oh Lady Liberty look down here
People decide what they want
We all have equal rights
Not only the MAGA white patriots
Oh my Lady, oh my Lady
Forgive me if I insist
Oh my Lady come down here
We can’t stand it any-more
Giovanna Paladino, PhD Group Senior Director - Head of Technical Secretariat of the Presidency IntesaSanpaolo, Director and Curator Museo del Risparmio, Senior Director Fondo Beneficenza Office of ISP. TRANSLATED TEXT Last Friday, the world day refugees was celebrated, a way to remember that in a world full of wars and persecutions there are people who have to flee their country to stay in the world and who can, with their talents, if welcomed and respected, also help the progress of our countries. Among the many projects that we support in 2025 with the ISP Charity Fund, I want to mention two that for their impact and design can be considered best practices. We support UNHCR for the creation of an integrated program of protection and empowerment of refugee and asylum-seeking women who have survived or are at risk of gender-based violence in Sicily (Catania, Syracuse, Ragusa) and Lazio (Rome, Frascati). 1,400 refugees and asylum seekers will be involved thanks to the work of a multidis...
Comments
Post a Comment